The Constitution of Independence: The Development of Constitutional Theory in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Introduction PART I: THE IMPERIAL CONSTITUTION 2. The Imperial Dominions 3. Parliamentary Sovereignty in the Empire and Commonwealth: Dicey's Dominions and Dogmas 4. Theories of Parliamentary Sovereignty after 1931: New and Revised PART II: CONSTITUTION TO INDEPENDENCE 5. canada I: Confederation and the Imperial Theory 6. Canada II: An Independent Constitutional Theory 7. Canada III: The Patriation Reference 8. New Zealand: Waitangi, Westminster, and Wellington 9. Australia I: Colonies, Conventions, and Canberra 10. Australia II: Westminster to Canberra PART III: CONSTITUTIONAL INDEPENDENCE 11. Legal Continuity or Disguised Revolution? 12. Theoretical Approaches to Sovereignty and Legal System 13. Constitutional Continuity and Constitutional Independence 14. Conclusion
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it