Restructuring caring labour : discourse, state practice, and everyday life
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Networking Across Difference: Connecting Restructuring and Caring Labour PART I: THE POWERFUL PRESENCE OF A RETREATING STATE IN DAILY LIFE 3. Being Managed, Managing and Making Demands: Conflicting Images of Older Women Receiving Care 4. Constructing the Single Mother 'problem': Rising Tides and Moral Panic 5. Need, Caring Labour, and the Neoliberal Agenda: Single Mothers on Assistance PART II: OF TIME, WORK, AND VOLUNTARY ACTION 6. Volunteerism, Gender, and the Welfare State: A Case Study in Child Day Care 7. Restructuring and Community Work: The Case of Community Resource Centres for Families in Poor Urban Neighbourhoods 8. Professionalization of Child Care PART III: DISAPPEARING JOBS REAPPEARING AS INVISIBLE WORK 9. Knowledge, Gendered Subjectivity, and the Restructuring of Health Care: The Case of the Disappearing Nurse 10. Transforming Rural Livelihoods: Gender Relations and Restructuring in Three Canadian Rural Communities 11. Restructuring Gender, Race, and Class Relations: The Case of Garment Workers and Labour Adjustment
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".