MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W612388465

Bilingualism : beyond basic principles : festschrift in honour of Hugo Baetens Beardsmore

2003· book· en· W612388465 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean‐Marc Dewaele, Alex Housen, Li Wei, Hugo Baetens Beardsmore

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultilingual Education and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroscience of multilingualismHonourSociologyNewcastle upon tyneMultilingualismArt historyLinguisticsPhilosophyArtPolitical scienceLawPedagogy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preface - Mike Grover Introduction - Jean-Marc Dewaele (Birkbeck College, University of London) Alex Housen, (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) & Li Wei, (University of Newcastle upon Tyne) 1. Who is afraid of bilingualism? - Hugo Baetens Beardsmore (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) 2. The importance of being bilingual - John Edwards (St Francis Xavier University) 3. Towards a more language-centered approach to plurilingualism - Michael Clyne (University of Melbourne) 4. Bilingual Education: Basic Principles - Jim Cummins (OISE, University of Toronto) 5. Accepting Bilingualism as a Language Policy - Gary M. Jones (University Brunei Darussalam) 6. Markets, Hierarchies and Networks in Language Maintenance and Language Shift Li Wei, (University of Newcastle upon Tyne) and Lesley Milroy (University of Michigan) 7. The imagined learner of Malay - Anthea Fraser Gupta (University of Leeds) 8. Code-switching and unbalanced bilingualism - Georges Ludi (University of Basle) 9. Codeswitching: Evidence of Both Flexibility and Rigidity in Language - Carol Myers-Scotton (University of South Carolina) 10: Rethinking bilingual acquisition - Fred Genesee (McGill University) Laudatio: Hugo Baetens Beardsmore-no hyphen please - Eric Lee (Institut Superieur de Traduction et d'Interpretariat, Brussels)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilingual Education and PolicyFrench-language works237,207