MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W61247079

Diabetes and the HOPE study: implications for macrovascular and microvascular disease.

2001· article· en· W61247079 on OpenAlexaff
Hertzel C. Gerstein

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRamiprilDiabetes mellitusMyocardial infarctionDiseaseInternal medicineStroke (engine)Type 2 diabetesMacrovascular diseaseRisk factorCause of deathEndocrinologyBlood pressure
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diabetes is a major risk factor for cardiovascular events. Indeed, people with diabetes are 2-4 times more likely to die from cardiovascular causes than individuals without diabetes. Despite evidence to suggest that the burden of cardiovascular disease may be decreasing in Western populations, this trend has not been repeated in diabetic populations. Diabetes is also the most common cause of new-onset end-stage renal disease, blindness and amputations. The growing incidence of diabetes throughout the world, particularly in developing nations, suggests that diabetes-related cardiovascular disease and other chronic cardiovascular diseases will constitute a serious global threat to health and well-being. The HOPE (Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation) study was designed to determine if the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, ramipril, prevents cardiovascular events in high risk patients. As people with diabetes have a high risk of such events, this group was specified for inclusion and analysis in the HOPE study. The HOPE study was designed to include up to 4,000 people with diabetes and was designed with high power to detect an 18% risk reduction in the diabetic sub group alone. A total of 3,577 individuals with diabetes were randomised to receive either 10 mg of ramipril or placebo. After a period of 4.5 years of follow-up, the group of patients receiving ramipril had a statistically and clinically significant risk reduction of 25% in the primary outcome of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or cardiovascular (CV) death. This comprises a 37% risk reduction in CV death, a 22% risk reduction in MI, a 33% reduction in stroke and a 24% reduction in all-cause mortality. The MICRO-HOPE (Microalbuminuria, Cardiovascular, and Renal Outcomes) sub study assessed the effect of ramipril on diabetic nephropathy. This was detected by a centrally measured urine albumin:creatinine ratio and confirmed by timed urine collection. Ramipril significantly reduced the risk of overt nephropathy by 22% (P = 0.045), and overt nephropathy, laser therapy or dialysis by 15% (P = 0.05). ACE inhibition with ramipril represents a new macrovascular and microvascular preventive therapy for people with diabetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicPharmacology and Obesity TreatmentFrench-language works237,207