Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Artists' Work Essays Celluloid, Laptops and Digital Magic Adrian Shaughnessy Tomorrowland Shane Walter Survey: Ten Years of Moving Images Various Biographical Notes Picture Credits Index Contents of DVD Contributions from all the artists featured in the book will be included in their entirety Airside - UK - London Wilfrid Brimo - FR - Paris +Cruz / W+K Tokyo Lab - JP - Tokyo Da Joint - HK - Hong Kong D-Fuse - UK - London Elekrotnik - JP - Tokyo Nakao Hiroyuki [P.I.C.S.] - JP - Tokyo Ed Holdsworth - UK - London Intro - UK - London Lobo - BR - Sao Paulo Takagi Masakatsu - JP - Kyoto MK12 - USA - Kansas Motomichi Nakamura - US - Brooklyn Ne-o - UK - London Jonas Odell - SW - Stockholm Pfadfinderei - GER - Berlin Plates Animation - CA - Toronto Pleix - FR - Paris Bob Sabiston - USA - Austin Edouard Salier - FR - Paris Timo Schaedel - GER - Hamburg Chris Shepherd - UK - London Floria Sigismondi - US - Los Angeles Smith + Foulkes - UK - London Tronic - USA - New York Satoshi Tomioka - JP - Tokyo Run Wrake - UK - London.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.148 | 0.021 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".