Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction - Competition, Regulation and Other Public Policies: An Overview Mel Marquis and Vejlko Milutinovic Panel I Economic Context, Market Malfunction and Public Action Welcome Philip Lowe Panel II Between Competition, Regulation and other Public Policies Written contributions to Panel II I Giorgio Monti, Regulatory Holidays in Utilities Regulation and EU Competition Law: A Case study on the Role of Efficiency Considerations in Economic Law II Anthony Pygram, Competition, Regulation and Other Public Policies in the UK Energy Sector III Geert Goeteyn, Regulation and Competition in the Aviation Sector: Focus on Airline Content and Global Distribution Systems IV Jon Stern, A Market Design for Water Trading in England and Wales: The Role of Water Rights V Rafael Allendesalazar, Does Merger to Monopoly Become Efficient When it Refers to Sector Regulators and the Competition Authority? VI Suzanne Kingston, Competition and Environmental Protection: A Case of Ne'er the Twain Shall Meet? VII Robert D Anderson and Anna Caroline Muller, Competition Policy and the Multilateral Trading System: Three Propositions,and Observation and Some Questions for Reflection Panel III Unilateral conduct in post-liberalization markets Written contributions to Panel III I Alexandre de Streel, The Antitrust Activism of the European Commission in the Telecommunications Sector II Lars Kjolbye, Enforcement of Article 102 TFEU in the Energy Sector III Ginevra Bruzzone and Marco Boccaccio, The Boundaries of Legitimate Conduct in Post-Liberalization Markets Panel IV Technology and Standard-essential Patents Written contributions to Panel IV I Calvin Goldman, Julie Soloway and David Dueck, Competition Policy and Technology Markets: A Canadian Perspective II Paul Lugard, Innovation in the Domain of EU Competition Law Enforcement: Blowing in the Wind? III Sven B Volcker, Promises, Promises ... Law and Policy Considerations with Respect to the Application of Article 102 TFEU to FRAND-Encumbered Standard-Essential Patents IV Cristina Caffarra and Pierre Regibeau, Patent Explosion and Patent Wars: Hold-Up, Royalties and Misunderstandings over 'Market Value' Panel V The Role of Courts. Reconciling Competition, Non-competition and Constitutional Imperatives Written contributions to Panel V I Kullike Jurimae, The Interaction between EU Transparency Policy and the Enforcement of EU Competition Law: Who Should Strike the Balance and How Should it be Struck? II Rosa Perna, The Role of Courts in Reconciling Competition, Non- Competition and Constitutional Imperatives: The Italian Experience III Douglas H Ginsburg and Daniel E Haar, Resolving Conflicts between Competition and Other Values: The Roles of Courts and Other Institutions in the US and the EU IV Ian S Forrester, Competition Law and Public Policy Considerations Conclusions Philip Lowe
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".