The genetic aetiology of otosclerosis in the population of Newfoundland and Labrador
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Otosclerosis is a common form of conductive and mixed hearing loss in Caucasian populations, with an estimated prevalence of 0.3-0.4%. Since 1998, eight loci have been mapped to otosclerosis in families with apparent autosomal dominant (AD) otosclerosis but none of the causative genes have been identified. Objective As no otosclerosis gene has yet been identified, the main objective of this thesis was to identify otosclerosis-disease causing genes by studying Newfoundland (NL) families. Methods Families with familial otosclerosis were identified and chracterized clinically. Those which fit the diagnostic criteria for otosclerosis were recurited for this study. Molecular genetic analyses of these families were carried out by genotyping, haplotyping, Sanger sequencing of candidate genes in linked regions and exome sequencing. Results One Family (2081) was solved through identification of a pathogenic variant (FOXL1c.976_990hetdel) in the FOXL1 gene at chromosome (Chr) 16q that was present in all affected individuals. The 15 base pair (bp) deletion was also identified in a second family from Ontario (ON) and the possible pathways involving FOXL1 in the pathogenesis of otosclerosis were suggested. In the second otosclerosis family, three III candidate variants were identified through exome sequencing of the candidate regions under a dominant model. Conclusion I have identified the first otosclerosis gene, FOXL1, a transcription factor involved in the disease pathogenicity. I also identified three possible candidate mutations for a second otosclerosis family. This finding will have a major impact on molecular genetic studies of other otosclerosis families and it will allows for genetic counselling and the possibility for gene therapies in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".