Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contributor's Biographies. Foreword. Acknowledgements. 1. What are the 'classic' articles in cartography? (Martin Dodge). Section One: Epistemological Practice. 2. Algorithms for the Reduction of the Number of Points Required to Represent a Digitized Line or its Caricature (1973) (David H. Douglas and Thomas K. Peucker). 3. Reflection Essay: Algorithms for the Reduction of the Number of Points Required to Represent a Digitized Line or its Caricature (Tom Poiker and David Douglas). 4. The Nature of Boundaries on 'Area-Class' Maps (1989) (David M. Mark and Ferenc Csillag). 5. Reflection Essay: The Nature of Boundaries on 'Area-Class' Maps (David M. Mark). 6. Strategies for the Visualization of Geographic Time-Series Data (1990) (Mark Monmonier). 7. Reflection Essay: Strategies for the Visualization of Geographic Time-Series Data (Mark Monmonier). 8. PPGIS in Community Development Planning: Framing the Organizational Context (2001) (Sarah Elwood and Rina Ghose). 9. Reflection Essay: PPGIS in Community Development Planning (Sarah Elwood and Rina Ghose). Section Two: Ontological Understanding. 10. Cartographic Communication and Geographic Understanding (1976) (Leonard Guelke). 11. Reflection Essay:Cartographic Communication and Geographic Understanding (Mordechai (Muki) Haklay and Catherine Emma (Kate) Jones). 12. A Conceptual Framework and Comparison of Spatial Data Models (1984) (Donna J. Peuquet). 13. Reflection Essay: A Conceptual Framework and Comparison of Spatial Data Models (Jeremy Mennis). 14. Designs on Signs: Myth and Meaning in Maps (1986) (Denis Wood and John Fels). 15. Reflection Essay: Designs on Signs/Myth and Meaning in Maps (Denis Wood and John Fels). Section Three: Politics and Society. 16. Deconstructing the Map (1989) (J.B. Harley). 17. Reflection Essay: Deconstructing the Map (Jeremy W. Crampton). 18. Cartography Without 'Progress': Reinterpreting the Nature and Historical Development of Mapmaking (1993) (Matthew H. Edney). 19. Reflection Essay: Progress and the Nature of 'Cartography'(Jeremy W. Crampton). (Matthew H. Edney). 20. Between Demythologizing and Deconstructing the Map: Shawnadithit's New-Found-Land and the Alienation of Canada (1995) (Matthew Sparke). 21. The Look of Surveillance Returns: Reflection Essay: Between Demythologizing and Deconstructing the Map (Matt Sparke). Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".