Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study, an attempt was made to improve the possibilities for rapid revascularization and original pulp tissue survival in replanted and autotransplanted mature dog teeth by increasing the contact area between the pulp and the vascularized periradicular tissues. In 12 teeth, the root tip was resected and 3 additional nutritional canals were prepared in the apical 1/3 of the root at the time of the operation. Another 12 teeth were replanted or autotransplanted with intact roots. After an observation time of 120 days, the teeth were studied with microangiographic and histologic techniques. 11 of the teeth that were replanted or autotransplanted with intact roots showed total pulpal necrosis. Partial or total pulpal revascularization and repair was seen in all apicoectomized teeth with nutritional canals. The revascularized area of the pulp was somewhat larger in the replanted compared to the autotransplanted group of teeth. Signs of survival of the original pulp tissue were not seen. A comparison of the findings with those of previous studies on replanted and autotransplanted teeth with apicoectomized roots but without additional canals shows that the revascularization of the pulp did not proceed more rapidly in the apicoectomized teeth in the present study, although the contact area between the pulp and the periradicular tissues was enlarged through the preparation of the 3 artificial nutritional canals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".