Bibliographic record
Abstract
On April 8 2012, Winnipeg's first rapid transit facility opened for service. Constructed during 2009-2011, this initial stage of the Southwest Transitway includes a 3.6 km grade-separated busway, three highly-developed stations, a tunnel beneath the CN main line, a bridge over a major arterial roadway, and active transportation facilities. The rapid transit routes use the transitway in combination with other transit priority measures and real-time passenger information systems to provide service that is fast, reliable, comfortable, and convenient. Project funding approval in 2008 included a commitment to complete construction of this $138 million project by the end of 2011. With preliminary design only partially completed at the time of funding approval, a condensed schedule for final design and construction was developed. To achieve the construction target, the following major elements of the project were tendered separately: 3.6 km of transitway runningway; 2.5 km of land drainage sewer; A 350 m transitway tunnel underpass of seven CN tracks; A land drainage pump station for the tunnel underpass; A 100 m overpass of a major arterial road; Three new transitway stations; Overall project signage, streetscaping, aesthetics and landscaping. The technical paper discusses how the challenging features of site, location, and construction conditions influenced implementation strategy, and how a unique mix of design ingenuity, technology, and equipment were used to successfully complete the project faster, and safer. For the covering abstract of this conference see ITRD record control number 201310RT334E.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".