Sex differences in tuberculosis in Hong Kong.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SETTING: The Hong Kong Tuberculosis and Chest Service, Department of Health, Hong Kong. OBJECTIVE: To examine sex differences in the rate and clinical manifestations of tuberculosis in Hong Kong. DESIGN: Notification rates of tuberculosis during the past five decades were obtained from the Hong Kong Tuberculosis and Chest Service, Department of Health, Hong Kong. In addition, all patients registered with the Chest Service for treatment of tuberculosis in 1996 were studied. RESULTS: The rate of tuberculosis during the past five decades was consistently higher in men than in women, irrespective of age group. The sex difference in rates was highest among those aged over 60 years. In 1996, a higher proportion of women had extra-pulmonary tuberculosis than men; the main site of involvement was the lymph nodes. More women completed treatment at 12 months and fewer women missed treatment appointments. A higher proportion of men had relapse pulmonary disease that was more extensive, a history of previous default from treatment and co-morbid illnesses. CONCLUSION: There are sex differences in the rates and clinical manifestations of tuberculosis in Hong Kong. Study of sex differences is essential for targeting prevention programmes at groups at higher risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".