MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W626713927

HOUSEHOLDS' DEFAULT PROBABILITY: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE HFCS*

2012· article· en· W626713927 on OpenAlex
Sónia Costa

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Bulletin and Financial Stability Report Articles · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicItaly: Economic History and Contemporary Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbability of defaultConsumption (sociology)Quarter (Canadian coin)EconomicsDebtHousehold debtDefaultCredit riskPortugueseFinancial stabilityDistribution (mathematics)EconometricsSurvey data collectionBusinessActuarial scienceFinancial systemFinanceStatisticsGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an environment where the Portuguese banking system has a high exposure to the household sector, identifying the households’ characteristics associated with a higher probability of default on loans is of great importance to monitor the outlook for credit risk and its consequences for the stability of the fi nancial system. This article estimates a probability of default for households which depends on their economic and socio-demographic characteristics and takes into account the existence of shocks that adversely affected their fi nancial situation. The estimated probability is used to characterize the distribution of credit risk for some household’s groups, which differ on their situation in the debt market, and for different types of loans. The analysis uses data from the Household Finance and Consumption Survey which took place during the second quarter of 2010.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it