MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W627128714

Local topography is more important than climate as a determinant of regional alpine plant diversity in southwestern British Columbia

2012· dissertation· en· W627128714 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katharine Baldwin-Corriveau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRangeland and Wildlife Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlant diversityGeographyAlpine plantDiversity (politics)Physical geographyClimate changeAlpine climateEcologyClimatologyPlant speciesGeologyBiologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mountain ecosystems are considered highly sensitive to the impacts of climate change, and are experiencing a magnitude of change that far exceeds global averages, particularly with respect to increases in average temperature and precipitation. As such, scientists are predicting a rapid habitat reduction or even the loss of the coolest climatic alpine zones, thus threatening the continued survival of high elevation specialists. However, many of these ‘doomsday’ predictions are based primarily on models with coarse-resolution changes to atmospheric climate parameters, and do not take into account the potential buffering effects of other environmental gradients known to structure alpine plant communities, related to topography and soils. To assess the accuracy of predictions regarding the state of vulnerability of alpine plant communities to climate change, this thesis examined the relative importance of climate, topography and soils as determinants of regional alpine plant diversity for all species, as well as for forbs, graminoids and woody species separately, in alpine meadows of southwestern British Columbia. Through redundancy analyses and variation partitioning, results show that topography and soils are more important than climate as determinants of regional alpine plant diversity. Within these groups, elevation, slope, soil moisture and mean summer temperature were most significant. Interestingly, precipitation played only a small role, even though the study area spanned a precipitation gradient of over 1200 mm/year. The stronger influence of temperature, especially for woody species beta diversity, supports findings of shrub expansion in arctic-alpine systems. The lower importance of climate as a determinant of regional alpine plant diversity, especially for forbs, the dominant life form in alpine meadow ecosystems, suggests that these productive environments may be more resilient to on-going changes in atmospheric climate conditions than previously believed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same topicRangeland and Wildlife ManagementFrench-language works237,207