MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W631590172 · doi:10.1385/1592590381

Nucleic Acid Protocols Handbook, The

2000· book· en· W631590172 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2000
Typebook
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Robotics and Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Cancer InstituteUniversity of California, DavisUniversitätsspital ZürichDeutsches KrebsforschungszentrumCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueInstitut Gustave-RoussyKungliga Tekniska HögskolanCoventry UniversityCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de QuébecPfizerYork UniversityUniversity College LondonInstitut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueWellcome TrustMayo Foundation for Medical Education and ResearchImperial College LondonUniversity of WashingtonMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyUniversité de GenèveKing's College LondonYale UniversityMassachusetts General HospitalColorado State UniversityBrigham and Women's HospitalTenovusFlorida State UniversityMedical Research CouncilIsrael Cancer Research Fund
KeywordsNucleic acidComputer scienceChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ralph Rapley, Ed., The Nucleic Acids Protocols Handbook (Totawa: Humana Press 2000) ISBN 978-0-89603-459-4, eISBN 978-1-59259-038-4, DOI 10.1385/1592590381

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.870

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it