Bibliographic record
Abstract
The change into a modern and efficient port has liberated large spaces, making it possible to plan a new quarter in Oslo. At present, the motorway that runs along the fringes of the dock area acts as a barrier between the city and the fjord, and this must be re-routed before urban development can take place. A number of private companies and public sector bodies have carried out a comprehensive planning process. In parallel with this process, contracts have been drawn up, which lay down responsibility for financing and ownership conditions once the development structure has been decided. Based on this, the Public Roads Administration has now commenced upon a road project in the heart of Oslo, which also includes Norway's first immersed tunnel. The total cost framework for the project is NOK 4,600 million, and the construction period will stretch over 7 years. The project will be completed in 2012. This is a project facing great technical and practical challenges, and is somewhat of a jigsaw puzzle if the surrounding areas are to suffer as little as possible during the construction period. Currently, main roads, and railway lines pass through the construction site, and the port activities must also proceed as normal. The construction site lies in what was Oslo's cradle 1,000 years ago, offering a number of archaeological challenges, and there has been industry in the port for 300 years, meaning that large volumes of polluted soil must be excavated and handled in an adequate manner. The main goal of the project was to prepare the way for the development of a new and futureoriented district that meets its inhabitants' needs and interests, at the same time as providing an efficient and safe highway system (A). For the covering abstract of the conference see ITRD E212343.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.014 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.148 | 0.061 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".