Weaning to Extubation Directly from High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in an Infant with Cystic Lung Disease and Persistent Air leak: A Strategy for Lung Protection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the successful weaning and extubation of an infant from a SensorMedics 3100A high-frequency oscillator without returning to conventional ventilation. A 7-week-old term infant with respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis complicated by cystic pulmonary lesions repeatedly failed attempts to return to conventional ventilation from high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) for weaning, because of recurrent pneumothoraces. A computed tomography of the chest revealed multiple well defined cysts of various sizes involving both lungs. Therefore, weaning to extubation from HFOV was proposed as a way of preventing further air leak. The weaning strategy consisted of a technique we refer to as "sprinting." Using this method, the patient was successfully extubated directly from HFOV, with no complications. A follow-up computed tomography of the chest showed marked improvement in the size of the cystic lesions. The patient was discharged home with no need for home oxygen therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".