MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W632895341

Innovative FRP Reinforced Concrete Bridges with Extended Service Life

2007· article· en· W632895341 on OpenAlex
Brahim Benmokrane, Amr El-Ragaby, Sherif El-Gamal, Ehab El-Salakawy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Board 86th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsServiceability (structure)Structural engineeringDeckGirderFinite element methodSlabFibre-reinforced plasticEngineeringPrestressed concreteStrain gaugeBridge (graph theory)ReinforcementService lifeGeotechnical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the design, construction details, and the results of field load testing and finite element modeling of four innovative concrete bridges. These bridges have been recently constructed in North America utilizing FRP composite bars as internal reinforcement for the concrete deck slabs. Three bridges, Magog, Cookshire-Eaton, and Val-Alain Bridges are located in Quebec, Canada, while the fourth one, Morristown Bridge, is located in Vermont, USA. The four bridges are girder-type with main girders made of either steel or prestressed concrete. The main girders are supported over spans ranging from 26.2 to 50.0 m. The bridge deck is a 200 to 230 mm thick concrete slab continuous over spans of 2.30 to 3.15 m. Different types of glass and carbon FRP reinforcing bars as well as conventional steel bars were used as reinforcement for the concrete deck slab. The four bridges are located on highways of different categories, which mean different traffic volumes and environmental conditions. The bridges are well instrumented at critical locations for internal temperature and strain data collection using fiber optic sensors. These gauges are used to monitor the deck behavior from the time of construction to several years after the completion of construction. The four bridges were tested for service performance using calibrated truckloads. In parallel, a finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted and verified against the results of the field load tests. The FEA was, then, used to verify the design and serviceability of the bridge decks. The analytical and field results, in terms of deflections, cracking, and strains in the reinforcement and concrete, under real service conditions showed a comparable performance of the FRP reinforced concrete bridge deck slabs to the steel reinforced ones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it