Architektur und Fotografie : Korrespondenzen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Here, one of Germany's most significant architects is seen through the eyes of one of the most renowned architectural photographers of the present day. Karljosef Schattner is one of Germany's most notable architects. He has been awarded many prizes for his work including the Great prize from the BDA, the Federal Republic of Germany, and the Honorary Fellow of the Incorporation of Architects of Scotland 1996. In Germany, his name is inextricably linked the residential town of Eichstatt in Bavaria where he worked from 1957-1991 as town architect. The architecture of his buildings and renovations is characterized by the use of contrasting forms, materials and methods of construction bringing about a sophisticated symbiosis of the old and the new. Klaus Kinold is a photographer who desires to show architecture as it is, and in this spirit he has spent his career capturing the most noteworthy buildings of the 20th century on film. Various exhibitions in Bielefeld, Munich, Rimini and Antwerp secured his international reputation, and his works can now be seen in numerous public collections including the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, the Canadian Center for Architecture, Montreal, the Denver Museum, Denver, and the Musei Comunali, Rimini. This volume searches for - and finds - the correlation between Schattner's architecture and Kinold's photography. Both aspire an objectivity and directness which allow the essence of architecture move the forefront. Yet their inclination towards realism is a far cry from banalization. On the contrary, it permits the quintessence of the object or its image be revealed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.125 | 0.121 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".