MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W637210978

Human Promoter Prediction Using DNA Numerical Representation

2010· article· en· W637210978 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFractal and DNA sequence analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRepresentation (politics)Computer scienceNatural language processingInformation retrievalPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the emergence of genomic signal processing, numerical representation techniques for DNA alphabet set {A, G, C, T} play a key role in applying digital signal processing and machine learning techniques for processing and analysis of DNA sequences. The choice of the numerical representation of a DNA sequence affects how well the biological properties can be reflected in the numerical domain for the detection and identification of the characteristics of special regions of interest within the DNA sequence. This dissertation presents a comprehensive study of various DNA numerical and graphical representation methods and their applications in processing and analyzing long DNA sequences. Discussions on the relative merits and demerits of the various methods, experimental results and possible future developments have also been included. Another area of the research focus is on promoter prediction in human (Homo Sapiens) DNA sequences with neural network based multi classifier system using DNA numerical representation methods. In spite of the recent development of several computational methods for human promoter prediction, there is a need for performance improvement. In particular, the high false positive rate of the feature-based approaches decreases the prediction reliability and leads to erroneous results in gene annotation.To improve the prediction accuracy and reliability, DigiPromPred a numerical representation based promoter prediction system is proposed to characterize DNA alphabets in different regions of a DNA sequence.The DigiPromPred system is found to be able to predict promoters with a sensitivity of 90.8% while reducing false prediction rate for non-promoter sequences with a specificity of 90.4%. The comparative study with state-of-the-art promoter prediction systems for human chromosome 22 shows that our proposed system maintains a good balance between prediction accuracy and reliability. To reduce the system architecture and computational complexity compared to the existing system, a simple feed forward neural network classifier known as SDigiPromPred is proposed. The SDigiPromPred system is found to be able to predict promoters with a sensitivity of 87%, 87%, 99% while reducing false prediction rate for non-promoter sequences with a specificity of 92%, 94%, 99% for Human, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis sequences respectively with reconfigurable capability compared to existing system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it