A Multicenter Investigation into the Occurrence of High-Pressure Excursions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The occurrence of sudden increases in premembrane pressures and membrane pressure differentials has drawn considerable attention and debate in the perfusion community. Several terms have been applied to this phenomenon, but the term that best describes this event is "high-pressure excursion" (HPE). The exact causes of HPE are still uncertain, but nonetheless widely speculated. However, their increased appearance seems to be very closely related to the removal/absence of human serum albumin from priming solutions. To investigate the reasons why HPE occur in some cardiopulmonary bypass cases, we present our findings in a multicenter, retrospective analysis of 2696 cardiopulmonary bypass cases. Of the 31 cases of HPE that were documented from the analysis, 60 preoperative and perioperative variables were gathered from the participating tertiary care centers. Our findings indicate that these pressure excursions had an occurrence of 1.14% in the three centers involved with this analysis. The largest occurrence of HPE tended to be in male (87.1%) coronary artery disease patients (96.8%) during the presence of the IV anesthetic Diprivan (74.2%). In conclusions, HPE are not perfusate related because it occurred in the presence of three perfusate combinations. They also do not seem to be oxygenator related or exclusive to hypothermic temperatures or heat exchangers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".