MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Population Demography, Distribution, and Movement Patterns of Atlantic and Shortnose Sturgeons in the Penobscot River Estuary, Maine

2008· article· en· W6418753 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen J. Fernandes

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chronic Diseases · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstuaryGeographyFisheryOceanographyPopulationDistribution (mathematics)DemographyGeologyBiologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus) and shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) overlap throughout most of their distribution along the Atlantic coast of North America from southeastern Canada to Florida, USA (Moser and Ross 1995). Both species are found in major coastal rivers, estuaries, and move into marine waters to varying degrees (Gilbert 1989). Atlantic sturgeon are an anadromous species throughout their range. Adults spend many years at sea before returning to reproduce in freshwater, and juveniles spend from two to six years in riverine and estuarine habitats before migrating to the marine environment (Bain 1997). In the southern part of their range, shortnose sturgeon are described to be "estuarine anadromous" (National Marine Fisheries Service 1998). In northern rivers their behavior is described as "freshwater amphidromy" (Bain 1997), which means that "migration from fresh water to the salt water, or vice-versa, is not for the purpose of breeding although it occurs regularly at some point(s) in the life cycle" (McDowall 1987). The Gulf of Maine distinct population segment (GOM DPS) of Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) is at moderate risk of becoming endangered in the next twenty years based on the status review conducted in 2005. No listing recommendation was provided by the review team for the GOM DPS because they determined there was insufficient data to allow a full determination of this population (Atlantic Sturgeon Status Review Team 2007). The shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) was listed as endangered in 1967 and remains listed under the ESA to the present. The initial listing was range wide, but the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has since recognized 19 distinct population segments (DPSs) occurring from New Brunswick, Canada to Florida, USA. There is little known about both species in the northern part of their range in the United States, and the Penobscot River is the largest river in this region that lacks recent documentation of sturgeon presence or status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chronic Diseases→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→