Cytomegalovirus resistance in solid organ transplant recipients treated with intravenous ganciclovir or oral valganciclovir
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The rate of cytomegalovirus (CMV) mutations conferring ganciclovir resistance was assessed in a trial comparing intravenous ganciclovir and oral valganciclovir for treatment of CMV disease in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. METHODS: Viral genes (UL97 and UL54) conferring ganciclovir resistance were amplified and sequenced from blood samples collected at days 0 (before therapy), 21 (end of induction) and 49 (end of maintenance). RESULTS: The overall risk of developing a confirmed or probable ganciclovir resistance mutation during treatment was similar for patients treated with ganciclovir (2.3%) and valganciclovir (3.6%; P=0.51). A persistent viral load at day 21 was associated with a significant risk of ganciclovir resistance by day 49 (odds ratio 11.83; P=0.022). In multivariate analyses, presence of a confirmed ganciclovir resistance mutation was independently associated with virological failure (viral load > or =600 copies/ml) at days 21 and 49. One-third (3/9) of patients with confirmed CMV resistance mutations had recurrent CMV disease. The plasma half-life of confirmed ganciclovir-resistant UL97 mutants was significantly longer than that of wild-type strains, polymorphic variants and strains with mutations of unknown significance (P=0.045). Multiple UL54 mutations of unknown significance were found in clinical strains. Viral kinetic analysis of these latter strains revealed no effect (negative or positive) on in vivo viral fitness. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with oral valganciclovir or intravenous ganciclovir results in similar and low rates of resistance mutations in SOT recipients. Patients with drug-resistant CMV strains often have virological failure and might have unfavourable clinical outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".