MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 1080: Calmodulin Plays an Important Role in Electrical Storm: Insights from a New Experimental Model

2007· article· en· W64344045 on OpenAlexaff
Yukiomi Tsuji, Masafumi Harada, Mayumi Hojo, Masayuki Shimano, Tomohiro Uchikawa, Yasuya Inden, Toyoaki Murohara, Stanley Nattel, Itsuo Kodama, Kaichiro Kamiya

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDefibrillationVentricular fibrillationCardiologyInternal medicineQT intervalAtrioventricular blockImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorDefibrillation thresholdCircadian rhythmSudden cardiac deathIncidence (geometry)PathophysiologyAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Electrical storm (ES), characterized by recurrent episodes of ventricular fibrillation (VF), is a serious clinical condition, importantly complicating implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. The pathophysiology and molecular basis of ES are poorly understood because of a lack of suitable animal models. Here, we report a new experimental model that features repetitive episodes of ICD firing for recurrent VF, in which we assessed the potential involvement of calmodulin in ES. Methods and Results: The incidence of ES was assessed in 8 rabbits that had been in chronic complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) for 90±12 days (M±SEM; range 50 –129 days), all of whom had undergone extracardiac ICD system implantation. The maximal number of intervals to detect VF (NID: 105/140) was programmed to avoid inappropriate shocks for incessant ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTs). Shock intensities were set >twice the defibrillation threshold (1.5±0.2 J). All rabbits had ICD-detected self-terminating VTs and corrected QT-interval (QTc) prolongation (226±12 versus 185±11 ms at baseline, P<0.05) before the first VF episode, and 7/8 rabbits subsequently developed ES, defined as ≥3 VF episodes per 24-hour. The ES appeared on day 30±7 and occurred for 19±5 days follow-up. The QTc was remarkably increased on the day of ES compared with the value on the day without ES (271±12 versus 219±10 ms, P<0.01). Analysis of 1006 VF episodes obtained from 8 rabbits showed no circadian variation of VF incidence. One-week infusion of W-7, a calmodulin antagonist, to 3 rabbits by osmotic pump caused dose-dependent reductions in days of VF (from 5.3±1.2 to 3.0±1.1 and 0.6±0.3*), VF episodes (from 20±3 to 19±7 and 1.7±1.2*) and self-terminating VT episodes (from 2572±854 to 997±197* and 178±24* for 1 week; all results are shown as before infusion to data during infusion of W-7 at doses of 297 and 744 μg/hr respectively; *P<0.05 versus before W-7) without shortening the QTc. Conclusions: This model shows a high incidence of ES, allowing for study of mechanisms and treatment of ES, as well as consequences of multiple high-energy shocks. The positive response of ES to W-7 suggests that the calmodulin/calmodulin kinase system may be crucial to the generation of ES in this model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→