Феноменология совладания с одиночеством в романтических отношениях
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem of coping with loneliness in those who are subjects of real romantic relationships or are not, is analyzed in the paper. Various phenomena of coping with loneliness in romantic relationships are described. Phenomenology of experience of loneliness and coping with it at the presence / absence of romantic relationships (partnership) in humans is considered. Respondents either romantically involved or not, aged 18 to 30, participated in the study. The authors used Russian language adaptation techniques SELSA Scales of emotional, family, social and romantic loneliness by Canadian authors E. DiTommaso and B. Spinner, 1993, for the study of romantic loneliness. The empirical study results confirm the hypothesis that the romantic relationship extend the range of coping strategies with loneliness, increasing their productivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.013 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.020 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.016 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.040 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".