SISTEMA AUTOMATIZADO PARA BANCO DE PRUEBA DE LOCOMOTORAS (BPLW)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se explica el funcionamiento del Sistema BPLW disenado para los Bancos de Prueba de Locomotoras canadienses MLW, que automatiza el proceso de pruebas y mediciones en los mantenimientos y/o reparaciones. Se describe la continuidad del proceso de automatizacion del Banco de Pruebas de Locomotoras de los talleres de ferrocarriles Jose Ramirez Casamayor. Se ha realizado el diseno sobre Windows y Visual C++, por lo que presenta facilidades visuales y de dialogo que simplifican las tareas del operador. Resumen en ingles: The present article explaind the System BPLW designed for the Banks os Test of Canadian Locomotives MLW that automates the process of tests and measurement of their parameters as part of the maintenance and/or repairs, offering the option of measuring in an independent way the aggregates of the Diesel Generator of other locomotives. It is possible to carry cut the tests of Adjustment, Settling and Consumption of Fuel, in an assisted way, since it goes indicating to the operator the actions to take. In cash operation. great utility for the operatiors of Banks of Tets, since it decrease in a considerable wayt time of execution of the tests, the human errors and time in the detection of technical problems of all type; with what an important increment is obtained in the quality of the tests. (A).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it