MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W644440900

A new facility for measurement of earth pressure at-rest

2002· article· en· W644440900 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T. J. Chen, Yung‐Show Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueGeotechnical engineering · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLateral earth pressureRest (music)Retaining wallGeotechnical engineeringBinStress (linguistics)Deformation (meteorology)Base (topology)EngineeringGeologyMechanicsStructural engineeringMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringPhysicsMathematicsComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To investigate the effect of stress-history on the earth pressure at-rest, an instrumented model retaining wall facility was developed at National Chiao Tung University. To achieve an at-rest condition, a stiff 1.6 m-high model wall and soil bin were made, so that deformation could be minimized. Soil-pressure transducers were attached to the center zone of the model wall to investigate the distribution of earth pressure. Air-dry Ottawa sand was used as backfill for the model wall experiments. The distribution of earth pressure at-rest induced by the 1.5 m thick loose backfill were approximately linear and in good agreement with Jaky's theoretical solution. For the pluviated fill, the measured coefficient of earth pressure at-rest, K(sub o) would be independent of the thickness of backfill. Calculations based on the experimental data indicated that the resultant forces were located at 0.34H to 0.35H above the base of the wall. It is hoped that the NCTU non-yielding retaining wall facility would provide a powerful tool to examine and justify the results obtained from theoretical and numerical studies based of many different assumptions. (A)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeotechnical engineeringSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationFrench-language works237,207