Disraeli Bridges Project
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The City of Winnipeg identified that there was a need for a major rehabilitation or replacement of the existing Disraeli Bridges (Red River Bridge and the CPR Overpass). The City conducted a value for money study over the proposed design life and determined that it was in their best interest to procure the work in the form of a Design Build Finance and Maintain (DBFM) agreement. The Plenary Roads Winnipeg (PRW) Team, comprised of Plenary, PCL, and Tetra Tech, was the preferred DBFM team. The design was developed in a collaborative manner with the construction and maintenance teams to ensure that the design met the intent of the bid and long-term performance objectives. Life cycle decisions were very important during the design development. Value engineering was conducted at all stages of the project development. This provided the City with the best plan for the project with the least impact to the public in terms of traffic and cost, and to the environment. The PRW team developed a construction plan that allowed for completion of the replacement of all the roadwork and bridge structures without any shut downs during business days, maintaining operational traffic. Geotechnical and environmental challenges included dealing with contaminated south riverbank soils and slope stability of the north riverbank. Construction of the new bridges began in spring of 2010. The Red River Bridge and CPR Overpass were officially opened on October 19, 2012. For the covering abstract of this conference see ITRD record number 201310RT334E.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".