Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction The general context for this chapter was set out in the Prolegomena, and I can proceed to substance. I focus in Section B on The Condition of the Working Class in England (1845), where Engels expresses the likelihood of violent revolution at the next cyclical crisis – notwithstanding an expectation that the Chartists' demands for an extended franchise would be met – with some hope that the communists might restrain the violence. Other statements are ambiguous regarding the manner of achievement of proletarian rule, but by 1847–8 the prospect of a successful constitutional outcome is viewed seriously, while the important Principles of Communism (1847) advises the prospective proletarian majority to undertake the dismantling of the private-property system. The realization of “democracy” by constitutional means had already occurred in the eastern states of the United States, whereas government intransigence rendered the prospect less promising in France. Much the same picture emerges from Marx's Poverty of Philosophy of 1847, where union activity combined with Chartist political activity is championed; and a Marx paper of October 1847 elaborates the achievement by constitutional means of “political equality” in the eastern United States. The joint Communist Manifesto itself justifies communist support for constitutional reform measures and calls for cooperation between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Section C principally concerns Marx's The Class Struggles in France 1848–1850 , which expresses disappointment at the failure of the June 1848 uprising.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".