MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W645087772 · doi:10.1002/9780470261316

Structural stability of steel : concepts and applications for structural engineers

2008· book· en· W645087772 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSection (typography)BucklingStructural engineeringTangent modulusDeflection (physics)Materials scienceEngineeringGeometryModulusMathematicsPhysicsComputer scienceClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter 1: Fundamentals of Stability Theory. Section 1.1 Introduction. Section 1.2 Basics of Stability Behavior : The Spring-Bar System. Section 1.3 Fundamentals of Post-Buckling Behavior. Section 1.4 Snap-Through Buckling. Section 1.5 Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems. Section 1.6 Summary. Problems. Chapter 2: Elastic Buckling of Planar Columns. Section 2.1 Introduction. Section 2.2 Large-Deflection Solution of an Elastic Column. Section 2.3 Differential Equation of Planar Flexure. Section 2.4 The Basic Case: Pin-Ended Column. Section 2.5 The Five Fundamental Cases. Section 2.6 The Effect of Imperfections. Section 2.7 Stability of A Rigid Frame. Section 2.8 End-Restrained Columns. Section 2.9 Restrained Column Examples. Section 2.10 Continuously Restrained Columns. Section 2.11 Summary. Problems. Appendix. Chapter 3: Inelastic Column Buckling. Section 3.1 The Tangent and Reduced Modulus Concepts. Section 3.2 Shanley's Contribution. Section 3.3 Example Illustrating the Tangent Modulus and the Reduced Modulus Concepts. Section 3.4 Buckling Strength ff Steel Columns. Section 3.5 Illustration Of The Effect of Residual Stresses on the Buckling Strength of Steel Columns. Section 3.6 The Effect of Initial Out-of-Straightness and Load Eccentricity. Section 3.7 Design Formulas For Metal Columns. Section 3.8 Summary. Problems. Chapter 4: Beam-Columns. Section 4.1 Introduction. Section 4.2 General Discussion Of The Behavior Of Beam-Columns. Section 4.3 The Elastic In-Plane Behavior Of Beam-Columns. Section 4.4 Elastic Limit Interaction Relationships. Section 4.5 Example Problems Of Beam-Column Strength. Section 4.6 Systematic Methods Of Analysis: Flexibility Method. Section 4.7 Systematic Methods Of Analysis: The Stiffness Method. Section 4.8 Inelastic Strength Of Beam-Columns. Section 4.9 Design Of Beam-Columns. Problems. Chapter 5: Frame-Stability. Section 5.1 Introduction. Section 5.2 Two-Bay Frame Examples. Section 5.3 Summary. Problems. Chapter 6: Lateral-Torsional Buckling. Section 6.1 Introduction. Section 6.2 Basic Case: Beams Subjected To Uniform Moment. Section 6.3 The Effect Of Boundary Conditions. Section 6.4 The Effect Of Loading Conditions. Section 6.5 Lateral-Torsional Buckling Of Singly-Symmetric Cross Sections. Section 6.6 Beam-Columns And Columns. Section 6.7 Inelastic Lateral-Torsional Buckling. Section 6.8 Summary. Problems. Chapter 7: Bracing. Section 7.1 Introduction. Section 7.2 Discrete bracing. Section 7.3 Relative Bracing. Section 7.4 Lean-on Bracing. Section 7.5 Effects of Imperfections. Section 7.6 Column Bracing Provisions. Section 7.7 Beam Bracing. Section 7.8 AISC Design Provisions for Beam Bracing. Section 7.9 Summary. Suggested Reading. Problems. Chapter 8: Specification - Based Applications of Stability in Steel Design. Section 8.1 Introduction. Section 8.2 Development of the beam-column interaction equations. Section 8.3 Assessment of Column Strength. Section 8.4 Assessment of beam strength. Section 8.5 Specification Based Approaches for Stability Assessment. Section 8.6 Effective Length Factors, aka K-factors. Section 8.7 Design Assessment Example. Section 8.8 Frame Design Requirements in Canada and Europe. Section 8.9 Summary. Problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations109
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Load-Bearing AnalysisFrench-language works237,207