Bibliographic record
Abstract
Property Rights Cohen, Moris R. Property and Sovereignty Cornell Law Quarterly 13 (1927), pp. 8-30. Honore, A. M. Ownership, in Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, edited by A. G. Guest (London: Oxford University Press, 1961): 107-147. Snare, Frank. The Concept of Property American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (1972), pp. 200-206. Gibbard, Allan. Natural Property Rights Nous 10 (1976), pp. 77-86. Macpherson, C. B. Human Rights as Property Rights Dissent 24 (1977): 72-77. Becker, Lawrence C. The Moral Basis of Property Rights, in Property: Nomos XXII, edited by J. Roland Pennock & John W. Chapman (New York: New York University Press, 1980): 187-220. Grey, Thomas C. The Disintegration of Property, in Property: Nomos XXII, edited by J. Roland Pennock & John W. Chapman (New York: New York University Press, 1980): 69-85. Miller, David. Justice and Property Ratio 1 (1980): 1-14. Waldron, Jeremy. What Is Private Property? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 5 (1985): 313-349. Duties of Redistribution Rawls, John. Distributive Justice, in Philosophy, Politics and Society, Third Series, edited by Peter Laslett and W. G. Runciman (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1967): 58-82. Robert, Nozick. Distributive Justice, Chapter 7, Section I, in Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, (New York: Basic Books, 1974): 149-182. Dick, James C. How to Justify a Distribution of Earnings Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (1975), pp. 248-272. Scanlon, Thomas. Nozick on Rights, Liberty, and Property Philosophy & Public Affairs 6 (1976), pp. 3-25. Scheffler, Samuel. Natural Rights, Equality, and the Minimal State Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (1976): 59- 76. Honore, Tony. Property, Title and Redistribution, in ARSP, Beiheft Nr. 10, Equality and Freedom: Past, Present and Future edited by Carl Wellman (1977): 107-115. Baruch, Brody. 'Redistribution without Egalitarianism', Social Philosophy & Policy 1 (1983): 71-87. Fried, Charles. Distributive Justice Social Philosophy & Policy 1 (1983): 45-59 Nelson, William. Rights, Responsibilities and Redistribution, in Economic Justice: Private Rights and Public Responsibilities, edited by Kenneth Kipnis and Diana T. Meyers. (Totowa NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1985):95-107.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".