Comparison of criteria for the classification of childhood arthritis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the applicability of the ILAR criteria for classification of childhood arthritis in an outpatient pediatric rheumatology clinic population, and to determine the proportion of children who met standard classification criteria, but failed to meet ILAR criteria for specific arthritides, and therefore became unclassifiable. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 70 consecutive patients who had arthritis for at least 6 months, and attended the clinic between September and November 1997. Sixty-nine patients were categorized according to one of the traditional classifications [ACR for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA), European Spondylarthropathy Study Group (ESSG) for spondyloarthropathy, Vancouver Criteria for juvenile psoriatic arthritis (JPsA)], and the ILAR classification system. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (88.4%) were classifiable by the ILAR system; 8 others failed to fulfill ILAR criteria for any specific category, and were assigned to the "other arthritis" category. Of the 29 patients with oligoarticular onset JRA, 6 were unclassified, 5 because of exclusions, and one because he fulfilled criteria for 2 categories. Presence of a family history of psoriasis accounted for most of the exclusions in the oligoarthritis and enthesitis related arthritis categories. All patients with polyarticular onset or systemic onset JRA were classified in the corresponding category in the ILAR system. One 9-year-old patient with spondyloarthropathy was reclassified as "other arthritis" because of exclusions. All 6 children with definite JPsA met ILAR criteria for PsA. Of 4 patients with probable JPsA, only 2 met ILAR criteria for PsA, a third was classified as rheumatoid factor negative polyarthritis, and the fourth was classified as "other arthritis" because of exclusions. CONCLUSION: The ILAR classification criteria applied to a group of children with chronic arthritis classified by traditional criteria results in reassignment of 11.6% of the patients, predominantly in the oligoarticular group. It will be important to determine the role of the presence of a family history of psoriasis in classifying these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".