MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W64749287 · doi:10.1111/jon200010284

Cerebrovascular Findings in Takayasu Disease

2000· article· en· W64749287 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Hoffmann, Peter Corr, J V Robbs

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroimaging · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTranscranial DopplerRadiologyMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroimagingPositron emission tomographyStroke (engine)Perfusion scanningNuclear medicinePerfusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors define the frequency, nature, and extent of cerebrovascular sequelae of Takayasu arteritis using functional imaging. Retrospective analysis of the cases derived from the Durban Stroke Data Bank (n = 1100) and Durban Metropolitan Vascular Surgery Database (n = 5300) consisted of evaluation by contemporary neuroimaging modalities including single positron emission computed tomography (SPECT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diffusion scanning, and transcranial Doppler (TCD). Of all the patients identified with Takayasu disease (n = 142), 29 (20%) patients were identified with a primarily cerebrovascular presentation. The recent advent of modern functional imaging techniques allowed only the 10 most recent patients with a cerebrovascular presentation to be evaluated. Of these 10, 8 (80%) had normal neurologic deficit scores (Canadian neurologic score) and 9 (90%) were not disabled as determined by handicap scores (Rankin). The anatomic brain scans (9 MRI, 1 CT) were normal in 5 patients (50%). In 7 patients, transcranial Doppler sonography revealed increased velocities mainly in the anterior circulation with turbulence that was not circumscribed. Single positron emission computed tomography scanning revealed areas of hypoperfusion, mostly multiple, in all of the 7 cases investigated. The cerebral perfusion index was determined in 7 patients, with a good prognosis in 2 patients and a moderate prognosis in 5. Cerebral effects of Takayasu disease are best monitored by a combination of clinical and functional imaging such as TCD and SPECT scanning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroimagingSame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207