Cerebrovascular Findings in Takayasu Disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The authors define the frequency, nature, and extent of cerebrovascular sequelae of Takayasu arteritis using functional imaging. Retrospective analysis of the cases derived from the Durban Stroke Data Bank (n = 1100) and Durban Metropolitan Vascular Surgery Database (n = 5300) consisted of evaluation by contemporary neuroimaging modalities including single positron emission computed tomography (SPECT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diffusion scanning, and transcranial Doppler (TCD). Of all the patients identified with Takayasu disease (n = 142), 29 (20%) patients were identified with a primarily cerebrovascular presentation. The recent advent of modern functional imaging techniques allowed only the 10 most recent patients with a cerebrovascular presentation to be evaluated. Of these 10, 8 (80%) had normal neurologic deficit scores (Canadian neurologic score) and 9 (90%) were not disabled as determined by handicap scores (Rankin). The anatomic brain scans (9 MRI, 1 CT) were normal in 5 patients (50%). In 7 patients, transcranial Doppler sonography revealed increased velocities mainly in the anterior circulation with turbulence that was not circumscribed. Single positron emission computed tomography scanning revealed areas of hypoperfusion, mostly multiple, in all of the 7 cases investigated. The cerebral perfusion index was determined in 7 patients, with a good prognosis in 2 patients and a moderate prognosis in 5. Cerebral effects of Takayasu disease are best monitored by a combination of clinical and functional imaging such as TCD and SPECT scanning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it