MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W64863132

Public Interest and Television Performance in Croatia

2009· article· hr· W64863132 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Marisa Torres da Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE) · 2009
Typearticle
Languagehr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia Studies and Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYork UniversityInternational Association for Media and Communication ResearchUniversity of Bedfordshire
KeywordsPublic interestPublic relationsMedia relationsDiversity (politics)Public broadcastingEntertainmentPublic servicePolitical scienceNews valuesPoliticsSociologyAdvertisingNews mediaMedia studiesBusinessLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pluralism and diversity of the media has in the past decade been in the focus of European media policy and critical analysis.The concern was partly related to the possibility of continued competition within the media industries in view of the enduring concentration trends, but even more to the possibility of continued contribution of the pluralistic and diverse media to democracy.Beyond this focal issue, at the heart of any media policy is the forgotten question: what is the contemporary social role of the media?Do we still see communication media as social institutions expected to contribute to society and culture?At the juncture of these issues arises the idea of public interest.Changes in media and communication technologies, media industries and economies as well as in global media realities are making us revisit this question every once in a while in the swiftly changing media history.As Aufderheide (1999) points out (after analyzing the changes in the USA from the 1934 to the 1996 Communications act), public interest is at the centre of communication policy, even if the technological development in the media sector would be the first suspect for the agent of policy change.The need for substantive research into the public interest implications of media policy were highlighted strongly by William Melody (1990) two decades ago.He was concerned with ensuring that new communication technologies (at that time CATV, VCR, satellite television, ISDN, and the nascent Internet) contribute to all segments of society.His was an appeal for continued media policy in the public interest in spite of the growing diversification and proliferation in channels, program types and ownership modes already evident at that time.Melody defined public interest in relation to the "essential functions of information and communication in modern participatory democracy, that is, to provide opportunities for citizens to be informed and to be heard " (1990:29).He highlighted two public interest aspects of media programs: diversity (especially in terms of the press), and public service programming (for the PSB's) or "programming in the public interest" for commercial broadcasters.In terms of the "beneficiaries" of the pubic interest,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE)Same topicMedia Studies and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207