MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W649453850

The indigenous experience : global perspectives

2006· book· en· W649453850 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roger Maaka, Chris Andersen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAnthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisIndigenousGenocideSovereigntyColonialismMohawkEthnologyPoliticsPower (physics)NavajoNarrativePolitical scienceHistoryEnvironmental ethicsGeographyAnthropologyGender studiesSociologyLawEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Indigenous Peoples Trade, Slavery, and Colonialism The Ecology of Ainu Autonomy and Dependence Hawaii Under Non-Hawaiian Rule Colonising Knowledges Extract from A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial in the Americas 1492 to the Present Settling In: Epidemics and Conquest to the End of the First Century Confronting Australian Genocide Killing the Indian in the Child: Four Centuries of Church-Run Schools The Guarani: The Economics of Ethnocide The West and the Rest: Discourse and Power Paths Toward a Mohawk Nation: Narratives of Citizenship and Nationhood in Kahnawake The Criminalisation of Indigenous People The Indians Are Coming to an End: The Myth of Native Desolation We Must Farm to Enable Us to Live: The Plains Cree and Agriculture to 1900 Imagining Civilisation on the Frontiers of Aboriginality Saami and Norwegians: Symbols of Peoplehood and Nationhood The New Politics of Resistance Politics within the Metis Association of Alberta Sovereignty -- An Inappropriate Concept Indigeneity at the Edge: Towards a Constructive Engagement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0120.021
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations117
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnthropology: Ethics, History, CultureFrench-language works237,207