MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W65003002 · doi:10.1093/pch/19.5.233-a

Case 1: Recurrent abdominal pain in an adolescent girl

2014· article· en· W65003002 on OpenAlexaff
Jason A. Silverman, Alfred K. Yeung, Sangeeta Jain, Fotini D. Kavadas

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAbdominal painRespiratory rateAbdomenErythrocyte sedimentation rateTachycardiaWhite blood cellAbdominal distensionAnesthesiaNauseaLeukocytosisTachypneaAscitesVomitingSurgeryHeart rateBlood pressureGastroenterologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 12-year-old girl presented to the emergency department with a three-day history of worsening, colicky periumbilical and lower abdominal pain. Associated symptoms included anorexia, nausea and nocturnal awakening. This was preceded by two days of upper respiratory tract infection symptoms including malaise, cough and fever. Vital signs demonstrated fever (38.8°C), tachycardia (heart rate 148 beats/min) and tachypnea (respiratory rate 28 breaths/min), but normal blood pressure and oxygen saturation on room air. Abdominal examination demonstrated tenderness in the mid and left lateral abdomen, with palpable fullness in the left lower quadrant. Elevated white blood cell count (15.7×109/L), platelet count (426×109/L), C-reactive protein level (17 mg/L [161.9 nmol/L]), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (16 mm/h) and normal serum albumin were noted. Abdominal ultrasound identified marked ascites and isolated bowel wall thickening of the sigmoid colon. The patient was admitted for observation. Gastroenterology and Pediatric Surgery were consulted regarding the abdominal pain and ultrasound findings. On further history, it was discovered that the patient had a five-year history of stereotypical recurrent abdominal pain. These episodes were much milder than at the time of presentation, and they occurred up to twice per month, resolving spontaneously within two days. Further history suggested the underlying diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicIntestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsFrench-language works237,207