Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acknowledgements Chapter 1: William Cross: Introduction Part I: Political Parties Chapter 2: R. Kenneth Carty, University of British Columbia, William Cross, and Lisa Young, University of Calgary: A New Canadian Party System Chapter 3: William Cross: Leadership Selection in New Brunswick: Balancing Language Representation and Populist Impulses Chapter 4: David K. Stewart, University of Manitoba and Kenneth Carty: Leadership Politics as Party Building: The Conservatives in 1998 Chapter 5: Elisabeth Gidengil, McGill University, Andre Blais, Richard Nadeau, both at the Universite de Montreal, and Neil Nevitte, University of Toronto: Party System and Anti-Party Sentiment Chapter 6: Roger Gibbins, University of Calgary and Jennifer Stewart, Mount Allison University: Wither or Whither the Populist Impulse in Western Canada? Chapter 7: Chedly Belkhodja, Universite de Moncton: Populism and Community: The Cases of Reform and the Condederation of Regions Party in New Brunswick Part II: Representation Chapter 8: John Courtney, University of Saskatchewan: Reforming Representational Building Blocks: Canada at the Beginning of the Twenty-first Century Chapter 9: Jennifer Smith and Herman Bakvis, both at Dalhousie University: Canadian General Elections and the Money Question Chapter 10: A Brian Tanguay, Wilfrid Laurier University: Parties, Organized Interests, and Electoral Democracy: The 1999 Ontario Provincial Election Chapter 11: Denis Stairs, Dalhousie University: Transnational Pluralism and the 'Democratization' of Canadian Foreign Policy at the Turn of the Millennium Chapter 12: Lisa Young, University of Calgary: Representation of Women in the New Canadian Party System Chapter 13: Louise Cabert, Dalhousie University: Historical Influences on Regional Patterns of the Election of Women to Provincial Legislatures Chapter 14: Elisabeth Gidengil, McGill University and Joanna Everitt, University of New Brunswick: Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't: Television News Coverage of Female Party Leaders in the 1993 Federal Election Contributors
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".