The psychology of justice and legitimacy : the Ontario Symposium
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preface. L.J. Skitka, N.P. Aramovich, B.L. Lytle, E.G. Sargis, Knitting Together an Elephant: An Integrative Approach to Understanding the Psychology of Justice Reasoning. D.R. Bobocel, A. Zdaniuk, Injustice and Identity: How We Respond to Unjust Treatment Depends on How We Perceive Ourselves. M.J. Callan, J.H. Ellard, Beyond Blame and Derogation of Victims: Just World Dynamics in Everyday Life. C.L. Hafer, L. Gosse, Preserving the Belief in a Just World: When and for Whom are Different Strategies Preferred? D.T. Miller, D.A. Effron, S.V. Zak, From Moral Outrage to Social Protest: The Role of Psychological Standing. J.M. Olson, C.L. Hafer, I. Cheung, P. Conway, Deservingness, the Scope of Justice, and Actions Toward Others. D. Gaucher, A.C. Kay, K. Laurin, The Power of the Status Quo: Consequences for Maintaining and Perpetuating Inequality. J.T. Jost, I. Liviatan, J. van der Toorn, A. Ledgerwood, A. Mandisodza, B.A. Nosek, System Justification: How Do We Know It's Motivated? K. van den Bos, Self-Regulation, Homeostasis, and Behavioral Disinhibition in Normative Judgments. J.M. Darley, D.M. Gromet, The Psychology of Punishment: Intuition and Reason, Retribution and Restoration. T.R. Tyler, Legitimacy and Rule Adherence: A Psychological Perspective on the Antecedents and Consequences of Legitimacy. S.C. Wright, D.M. Taylor, Justice in Aboriginal Language Policy and Practices: Fighting Institutional Discrimination and Linguicide. K. Schumann, M. Ross, The Antecedents, Nature and Effectiveness of Political Apologies for Historical Injustices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it