MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W651965819

Gender Differences: The Roles of Travel and Time Use in Subjective Well-Being

2015· article· en· W651965819 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthias Sweet, Pavlos Kanaroglou

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Board 94th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubjective well-beingTime-use surveyPsychological interventionPsychologyQuality of life (healthcare)Quality (philosophy)Value (mathematics)Demographic economicsDemographyGerontologySocial psychologyWork (physics)HappinessMedicineEconomicsSociologyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research employs time use data from the Canadian General Social Survey of 2010 to explore the links between travel, activity participation, and subjective well-being. Planners have long discussed the desire to improve quality of life, but research on this topic has been more nascent. Quality of life, or subjective well-being (SWB), describes the extent to which the overall quality of life is positively assessed. In this study, structural equation models are estimated to identify links between daily travel times, time use, and subjective well-being. Models are estimated independently for men and for women and results suggest important gender differences in how targeting travel and time use outcomes could improve quality of life. Policy objectives to reduce travel times target alleviating a travel outcome which disproportionately influences men, who travel 15 minutes more per day than women. While policymakers justify interventions on the basis of reducing travel times, this study suggests that daily travel times are unassociated with subjective well-being among either gender. But employed women participate in two more time-use incidents per day than employed men, on average – partly based on evidence of gender role differences when children are in the household. Despite higher activity participation rates among women, a disconnect remains between desired and observed activity participation. Participating in more activities is linked with greater subjective well-being among women, but not among men. Using shadow prices of SWB to monetize the value of participating in additional activities, results suggest that modest increases can create valuable SWB-related benefits. These marginal benefits are highest for those women currently engaging in few activities and for women from high-income households. But redressing the disconnect between demand for activities and potential to engage in them is not only a function of transportation-land use policies which foster the potential to participate in activities through travel. Cultural norms about gender divides in child-related responsibilities also appear to play an important role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Board 94th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardSame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207