Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Viking, Laval and Beyond: An Introduction Mark Freedland and Jeremias Prassl 2. Viking and Laval: The EU Internal Market Perspective Steve Weatherill 3. Viking and Laval: The International Labour Law Perspective Alan Bogg 4. The Right to Strike in the EU after Accession to the ECHR: A Practical Assessment Vilija Velyvyte 5. The Life of a Death Foretold: The Proposal for a Monti II Regulation The Adoptive Parents 6. Three Dimensions of Heterogeneity: An Overview of Member State Experiences Jeremias Prassl 7. Austria Eva Tscherner 8. Estonia Tatjana Evas 9. Germany Bernd Waas 10. Greece Aristea Koukiadaki 11. Italy Edoardo Ales 12. Norway Stein Evju 13. Poland Leszek Mitrus 14. Sweden Mia Ronnmar 15. The United Kingdom Tonia Novitz and Phil Syrpis 16. Civilising the European Posted Workers Directive Nicola Countouris and Samuel Engblom 17. Broader Lessons for European and Domestic Labour Law Robert Rebhahn 18. Conceptualising Conflict between the Economic and the Social in EU Law after Viking and Laval Dorota Leczykiewicz 19. EU Law in National Courts: Viking, Laval and Beyond Michal Bobek 20. Epilogue Ulf Bernitz
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it