"But Only on a Question of Law": Examining the Scope of Appellate Review of the Landlord and Tenant Board
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RtSUMkSelon la Loi sur la location i usage d'habitation, 2006, la competence d'un tribunal d'appel en revision de decisions de la Commission de la location immobili~re est limit~e aux questions de droit.Cet article a deux objectifs principaux : rexamen des limites et des contours de ce qui pourrait constituer o une question de droit> aux fins d'appel de la Commission et lexamen de la norme de contr6le judiciaire applicable.La norme de contr6le judiciaire applicable d6pend en grande partie de la nature de la (< question de droit > soulev~e en appel, et dans ce cas la norme est semblable h celle appliqu~e aux appels de decisions judiciaires.I1 est g~n~ralement admis que la norme est celle de la decision correcte quant aux questions de droit, et de ce fait, il est de la plus haute importance de pr~ciser ce qui constitue une question de droitce qui n'est pas toujours facile.Cet article 6tudie h fond comment extraire des questions de droit a partir de questions de fait ou de questions mixtes de fait et de droit.De plus, certaines questions de droitc.-A-d.les r~gles de la justice naturelle, le devoir d'quit6 de la procedure et le pouvoir discr& tionnaire conf~r6 par la loifont appel h une norme diff~rente du fait d'approches analytiques distinctes appliqu~es a ces types de questions juridiques.Larticle passe en revue Dunsmuir c. Nouveau-Brunswick, [2008] 1 R.C.S. 190, oil la Cour supreme du Canada a 6clairci le fait qu'il n'existe plus A present que deux normes de revisioncelle de la d6cision correcte et celle de la raisonnabilit6et 6value t'impact de cet 6claircissement sur la norme en usage A la Commission.IEarticle fait valoir que Dunsmuir n'aura pas un impact d'importance a la Commission et cela largement du fait que la Commission ne poss~de pas d'expertise hautement sp~cialis~e.Toby Young is a Director of Legal Services at the Human Rights Centre Legal Support Centre.He is the former Provincial Director of the Tenant Duty Counsel Program at the Advocacy Centre for Tenants Ontario.He specialized in residential tenancy law for over a decade.This article expresses the personal views of the author and reflects the law as of June 2008.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.073 | 0.252 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.037 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.022 | 0.019 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.020 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".