MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abnormally Small BCR-ABL Transcripts in CML Patients before and during Imatinib Treatment.

2006· article· en· W65840692 on OpenAlexaff
Jamshid S. Khorashad, Jeffrey H. Lipton, David Marín, Dragana Milojković, Nicholas C.P. Cross, N. J. Dibb, Junia V. Melo, Suzanne Kamel‐Reid, John M. Goldman, Jane F. Apperley, Jaspal Kaeda

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyExonImatinib mesylateFusion geneAmpliconABLImatinibTyrosine kinaseAlternative splicingbreakpoint cluster regionCancer researchFusion transcriptMolecular biologyGeneticsGenePolymerase chain reactionMyeloid leukemiaReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Neoplastic cells bearing fusion genes that express an activated tyrosine kinase may set the scene for accumulation of genetic lesions by dysregulating DNA damage repair mechanisms and causing genetic instability. The observation that the BCR-ABL fusion gene alters pre-mRNA splicing in a variety of other genes including Ikaros and PYK2 supports this hypothesis. However, the only current evidence for acquired genetic change in the BCR-ABL gene itself is limited to finding mutations in the BCR-ABL kinase domain in patients treated with imatinib mesylate (IM). Here we report the observation that some patients with CML have abnormally small BCR-ABL transcripts both before and during treatment. Patients with sub-optimal response to IM are screened for mutations specifically within the BCR-ABL kinase domain by performing nested PCR, thereby excluding amplification of the non-translocated ABL allele. In the first round PCR amplification is performed across the fusion and the amplicons generated are subjected to a second round to yield an expected 863 bp (containing ABL exons 4 through 9 and thus the entire BCR-ABL kinase domain) PCR fragment. Smaller amplicons were observed in 49 (9.9%) of the 494 CML patients investigated. There was marked variation in the mRNA species when the abnormally small amplicons were subjected to direct sequencing; we found exon skipping, intra-exon splicing and insertion of intronic sequences. Similarly, in some cases the open reading frame was maintained whilst in others there were frame shifts leading to premature stop codons. The commonest finding, (22 of the 49 patients) was skipping of ABL exon 7 from codons 362 to 424, which includes the activation loop of the kinase domain. The smaller amplicons persisted even after the first round products had been diluted to 1:160. We also noted that the normal 863 bp fragment was present in some cases but was not detectable in others; its absence could reflect preferential amplification of the smaller transcripts. In a number of cases the same abnormally short amplicons were identified in the same patient studied serially on three or more separate occasions. We subsequently performed a second round of nested PCR with primers designed to amplify across the BCR-ABL junction such that the product included sequences from BCR 13 to ABL exon 9. With these new primers the detection frequency of abnormally small transcripts was increased. Furthermore, we observed the smaller transcripts in all of the 12 patients tested prior to beginning IM therapy. We then sought to determine if the normal ABL allele was involved; in order to avoid amplifying the BCR-ABL kinase domain, we performed a single round of PCR and restricted the analysis to patients in complete cytogenetic remission (CCyR). Only the expected 863 bp amplicon was observed in cDNA samples from 19 CML patients in CCyR whose BCR-ABL/ABL ratios ranged from 0.01 to 0.98. Furthermore, the smaller amplicons were not observed in cDNA samples from 20 normal individuals. We conclude that these abnormalities may result either from aberrant alternative splicing or from spontaneous deletions, or from a combination of both mechanisms. They may be a manifestation of the genetic instability believed to be an integral feature of CML.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207