MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W66305921 · doi:10.1096/fasebj.21.5.a559

Role of locus coeruleus neurons in central O <sub>2</sub> chemoreflex during development in <i>Rana catesbeiana</i>

2007· article· en· W66305921 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stéphanie Fournier, Richard Kinkead

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalHôpital Saint-François d'Assise
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLocus coeruleusBrainstemRanaBullfrogAmphibianBiologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineHypoxia (environmental)Central nervous systemTyrosine hydroxylaseNeuroscienceChemistryMedicineDopamineEcologyOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In bullfrog, brainstem hypoxia elicits stage‐dependent changes in fictive lung ventilation in vitro . Noradrenergic neurons seem necessary to this reflex because α 1 ‐adrenoceptor inactivation prevents this response. Since we know that locus coeruleus (LC) contains a wide concentration of noradrenergic neurons in amphibian, we used an in vitro brainstem preparation from Rana catesbeiana to test the hypothesis that LC neurons are necessary to the fictive lung ventilation response to central hypoxia. We compared the effects of brainstem transection prior nerve VII from pre‐metamorphic tadpoles and adults. Transection before hypoxia prevents the decrease in lung burst frequency in adult frogs and the increase in pre‐metamorphic group from stage XII but not from stages VIII–IX. Immunohistochemistry for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) showed that in the LC, adults have more TH‐positive neurons than in pre‐metamorphic stages. We conclude that noradrenergic neurons from the LC area are necessary for the manifestation of the central O 2 chemoreflex in Rana . However, these neurons undergo important reorganisation during development. Funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHigh Altitude and HypoxiaFrench-language works237,207