Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TWO SPECIAL ISSUES appearing twenty-four years apart, in 1963 and 1987, Esquire Magazine published feature articles purporting to indicate just where the major centers of literary power are located in the United States and which writers have the greatest influence on the course of national literary affairs. When studied side by side, the two sets of findings provide the basis for some illuminating insights into the nature of the American literary life as it has evolved or, depending on one's point of view, devolved over the last quarter century. Much of the information given in the two issues is presented through the medium of double-page maps on which persons and places considered by Esquire to be literarily important are located. On the 1963 map these are designated in a fairly prosaic fashion, with specific areas of artistic interest marked out in different colors according to their roughly terrestrial placement under such headings as Squaresville, Ivory Tower, College Campuses, and Cool World. But the format chosen for the 1987 presentation clearly embodies an attempt at something far more grandiose. Any resemblance to the earth iserased from the map, and what is depicted is spectacularly cosmplogical. The persons and places possessing the greatest concentration of literary power are represented now as Stars, Nova, Ursae Majoris, and Media Showers, and by the various signs of the zodiac. In short, by 1987 the map has become a perfect mirror for the present age of showbusiness celebrity and glitz. In slightly more than twenty years it seems we have arrived at such a hyped-up condition of euphoria that we no longer see ourselves as dealing with mere places and people but as inhabiting a literary cosmos sparkling with the first-magnitude incandescence of Heavenly Bodies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it