MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6884322867 · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c07509.s001

Vanadium\nStable Isotopes in Biota of Terrestrial and\nAquatic Food Chains

2021· article· en· W6884322867 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicVanadium and Halogenation Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiotaTerrestrial plantTerrestrial ecosystemSedimentFood chainStable isotope ratioAquatic ecosystemSoil waterTRACER

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vanadium, a potentially toxic metal,\nis enriched in the environment\nfrom anthropogenic releases, particularly during fossil fuel production\nand use and steel manufacturing. Metal stable isotopes are sophisticated\ntools to trace pollution; however, only recent analytical advances\nhave allowed for the accurate and precise measurement of vanadium\nisotope ratios (δ<sup>51</sup>V). To examine its potential as\na tracer in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, δ<sup>51</sup>V was measured in soil, plant, lichen, marten, and lake sediment\nfrom sites near vanadium emissions at oil sands mines (Alberta, Canada)\nand in the sediment and biota (algae, zooplankton, fish) from a remote\nsubarctic lake (Northwest Territories, Canada). Samples from Alberta\nhad distinct δ<sup>51</sup>V values with marten liver the lowest\n(−1.7 ± 0.3‰), followed by lichen (−0.9\n± 0.1‰), soil (−0.7 ± 0.1‰), sediment\n(−0.5 ± 0.2‰), and plant root (−0.3 ±\n0.2‰). Average values were lower than Alberta bitumen and petroleum\ncoke (−0.1 ± 0.1‰). Plant roots had systematically\nhigher δ<sup>51</sup>V than the soil from which they grew (Δ<sup>51</sup>V<sub>plant‑soil</sub> = 0.4 ± 0.1‰),\nwhile δ<sup>51</sup>V of lichen and aquatic biota were lower\n(0.1–0.3‰) than likely crustal sources. These δ<sup>51</sup>V measurements in terrestrial and aquatic biota demonstrate\npromise for tracer applications, although further study of its biological\nfractionation is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.287
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0700.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicVanadium and Halogenation ChemistryFrench-language works237,207