MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Drivers of Declining\nWater Access in Alaska

2022· article· en· W6884408330 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWater Governance and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Government (linguistics)Service (business)Capital (architecture)Survey data collectionAmerican Community Survey

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A majority of homes in the United States (US) receive\nhousehold\nwater services via complete in-home plumbing. Observers tend to assume\nthat in the US, there is an upward trend in plumbing access; yet in\nsome Alaska communities, the rate is in fact a downward trend. This\nstudy seeks to identify, while considering the spatiotemporal variations\nin the region, the sociodemographic parameters that are correlated\nwith the rates of in-home plumbing in Alaska communities. Equipped\nwith American Community Survey data from 2011 to 2015, we employed\na fixed-effects regression analysis. Our findings show that, concerning\ncomplete in-home plumbing, there was a statistically significant decrease\nin close to a quarter (23%) of census-designated places in Alaska.\nAccess to complete plumbing is correlated to multiple sociodemographic\ncharacteristics, including the percentage of households that (1) receive\nsocial security, (2) are valued under $150,000, and (3) are renter-occupied\nunits paying for one or more utilities. Our results help decision-makers\nefficiently allocate government funds by showing where service is\ndeteriorating as well as the potential predictors of such decline.\nOur study reveals the pressing need to invest in not only new water\nsystems but also maintenance, operations, and capital improvements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3270.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicWater Governance and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207