Sustained Release of Heparin\non Enlarged-Pore and\nFunctionalized MCM-41
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mesoporous silica MCM-41 and SBA-15 were chosen to study\nthe adsorption\nand release of bulky biomolecule heparin, in order to develop new\nheparin controlled delivery system and expand the application of mesoporous\nmaterials in life science. To explore how the structure of support\nsuch as pore size and surface state affects the accommodation and\nrelease of heparin, we used decane as swelling agent to enlarge pores\nof MCM-41, introduced amino groups for improving the biocompatibility\nof support, and controllably retained templates in the as-synthesized\nsample. The influence of modification on the structure of samples\nwas investigated by XRD and N<sub>2</sub> adsorption–desorption,\nwhereas their performance of adsorbing and releasing heparin was assessed\nwith that of toluidine blue method. Both enlarged pore and organic\nmodification significantly promoted the adsorption and prolonged the\nrelease of heparin in MCM-41, and the release was characterized with\na three-stage release model. The mechanism of heparin release from\nmesoporous material was studied by fitting the release profiles to\nthe theoretical equation. As expected, some mesoporous composites\ncould release heparin in the long term with tuned dosage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.137 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".