Schottky Barrier Thin\nFilm Transistors Using Solution-Processed <i>n</i>‑ZnO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Solution-processed ZnO thin films are attractive as active\nmaterials\nin thin film transistors (TFTs) for low-cost electronic device applications.\nHowever, the lack of true enhancement mode operation, low mobility,\nand unreliability in transistor characteristics due to the high density\nof traps and other defects present challenges in using such TFTs in\ncircuits. We demonstrate in this report that the electrical characteristics\nof such TFTs can be improved by source injection barriers. Asymmetrical\nSchottky source metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect\ntransistors (MOSFETs) have been fabricated by utilizing heavily doped\nsolution-processed ZnO as the active layer. <i>n</i><sup><i>+</i></sup>-ZnO was obtained by using triethylamine\nas the stabilizer in the solution process instead of the more commonly\nused monoethanolamine. Au was chosen for source metallization to create\na Schottky contact to the ZnO and an Al ohmic contact was chosen as\nthe drain. Voltage applied to the gate induced field emission through\nthe Schottky barrier and allowed modulation of the drain current by\nvarying the width of the barrier. By operating the asymmetrical MOSFET\nwhen the Schottky contact is reverse biased, effective control over\nthe transistor characteristics was obtained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".