Attending to the Needs of Newcomer Youth: A Collective Case Study of School Integration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, scholars have been calling for more innovative research in the area of immigration. Specifically, they are challenging the common acculturation strategies often used to describe the experiences of newcomer youth. Newcomer youth themselves have described school as a primary arena influencing their post-migration experiences. However, comprehensive reports continue to reveal unjust educational practices that place newcomer youth at risk of school disengagement. In response, this body of work focuses on the phenomenon of school integration. School integration represents a new point of entry to explore the adjustment of newcomer youth across all aspects of student life. This includes language acquisition, academic performance, classroom behaviour, social networking, identity negotiation, emotional and familial well-being, involvement in school life, and understanding of the academic system.A social constructionist epistemology, incorporating an integrated social justice lens, guided a collective case study within a single high school in Alberta. This inquiry was guided by the following overarching research question: How do participants perceive and describe newcomer youths’ experiences integrating into high school? Consisting of three manuscripts, this dissertation critically explores the experiences of three stakeholder groups (i.e., newcomer students, teachers, and service providers), with the aim of systematically weaving together a more holistic narrative of the factors impacting school integration.Manuscript 1 highlights the voices and experiences of 13 newcomer youth who entered high school in Alberta and offers insight into the triumphs and perils they face within a singular high school setting. Manuscript 2 explores the perspectives of eight teachers who support newcomer students in their daily practices, three of whom teach English as an Additional Language (EAL) courses. Finally, Manuscript 3 centres on the perspectives of six services providers, including a vice principal, school guidance counsellors, settlement workers, and an at-risk youth coordinator.Taken together, the findings from the case study complement traditional immigration frameworks and offer systemic solutions to help improve the social, emotional, and academic transitions of newcomer youth as they enter a new school system. It pushes beyond multicultural initiatives and strives towards more socially just research, training, policies, and practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.033 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".