MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6884645141 · doi:10.11575/prism/41880

Parental Perspectives of the Impact of Emotion Dysregulation on Challenging Behaviours in Autistic Children

2023· other· en· W6884645141 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsAutismFeelingThematic analysisEmotional dysregulationRelation (database)ReflexivityAutism spectrum disorderExpression (computer science)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by impairments in social communication, as well as restricted and repetitive behaviours. It is well established in the literature that difficulties with emotion regulation and the display of challenging behaviours are prominent secondary characteristics of autism that have negative consequences for both the individual and their family. Though emotion dysregulation and challenging behaviours are well studied as separate constructs, little is known about the relation between the two, how one affects the presentation of the other, and the relative implications for intervention. This thesis sought to understand the relation between emotion dysregulation and challenging behaviours by gathering parental perspectives of the perceived impact that emotion dysregulation has on their child’s challenging behaviour and the related implications for intervention. Methodology: This study was intended to be a mixed method analysis using a quantitative online survey to capture the frequency and severity of challenging behaviour and observable indicators of poor emotion regulation followed by a qualitative semi-structured interview. Results: Due to the small sample size, the quantitative data was not included in analysis and was only used to inform the construction of the qualitative semi-structured interview. Reflexive thematic analysis identified eight themes and two subthemes under the domains of emotion dysregulation, challenging behaviours, and the relation between emotion dysregulation and challenging behaviours. Discussion: This thesis identified novel information under the domains of emotion dysregulation, challenging behaviour, and the relation between the two constructs. The results present evidence of communication impairments eliciting feelings of dysregulation in autistic children, and that the inability to engage in adaptive emotion regulation and properly communicate their feelings prohibits them from choosing and engaging in an appropriate emotional response or strategy. Consequently, autistic children seem to engage in challenging behaviour. The current findings can inform programs and services that support autistic children with the goal of decreasing challenging behaviour and increasing adaptive emotion regulation skills. Important implications for future researchers include quantitatively exploring the severity of communication impairments in autistic children and how it affects both emotion dysregulation and challenging behaviour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→