MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6884649316 · doi:10.11575/ajer.v63i3.56301

Health and Weight Beliefs and Behaviours of Pre-Service Teachers: Considerations and Implications for a Health Promotion Perspective in Teacher Education

2016· article· en· W6884649316 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Calgary · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicObesity and Health Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBachelorPerspective (graphical)CurriculumHealth educationHealth promotionHealth professionals

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project explored primary and secondary pre-service teachers’ (i.e., bachelor of education [B.Ed.] students) beliefs about health behaviours as well as health and weight during their university education at a large research-intensive university in Alberta. Although many studies claim that there is a need for teacher education in the areas of health and weight, recommendations for what such curricula might include are lacking. The present study was conducted with 226 pre-service teachers. Data included participants’ self-reported height, weight, body satisfaction, health promoting behaviours, implicit weight bias, and current weight loss and muscle gain attempts. Results suggest many pre-service teachers have concerns about their weight and shape, and exhibit weight bias. Teacher education focusing on body satisfaction, weight bias, exercise behaviour, and stress management may be beneficial for pre-service teachers to better prepare them to instruct about as well as model health attitudes and behaviors to their future students. Ce projet a exploré les croyances de stagiaires au primaire et au secondaire (c.-à-d. des étudiants au Baccalauréat en Éducation) sur les comportements liés à la santé, la santé et le poids pendant leur parcours dans une grande université albertaine centrée sur la recherche. Si plusieurs études affirment que les enseignants doivent être formés dans le domaine de la santé et du poids, les recommandations quant à ce que pourrait inclure une telle formation sont inexistantes. L’étude, réalisée auprès de 226 stagiaires, a demandé aux participants de fournir des données relatives aux éléments suivants : taille, poids, satisfaction à l’égard de leur corps, comportements favorables à la santé, partialité implicite envers les gens présentant un excès de poids, perte de poids actuelle et tentatives d’augmenter la masse musculaire. Les résultats indiquent que plusieurs stagiaires sont préoccupés par leur poids et la forme de leur corps, et qu’ils montrent un préjugé face aux personnes avec de l’embonpoint. Une formation qui porterait sur la satisfaction à l’égard de son corps, la partialité envers les gens présentant un excès de poids, les comportements liés à l’exercice physique et la gestion du stress pourrait s’avérer bénéfique pour les stagiaires, qui seraient ainsi mieux préparer pour enseigner à leurs élèves des attitudes et des comportements liés à la santé, et pour en être de bons modèles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of CalgarySame topicObesity and Health PracticesFrench-language works237,207